KEBEBASAN (I)

Terdorong oleh polemik berkenaan 'kebebasan akhbar' dan 'kebebasan kehakiman' yang menjadi percakapan banyak orang di Malaysia akhir-akhir ini, saya telah menelusuri artikel para jurnalis dan tulisan orang-orang yang ahli dalam bidang berkenaan.

Justeru saya ketemui dua artikel yang sangat menarik dan menyeronokkan: Bloomberg News Humbled oleh William Safire yang tersiar dalam The New York Times pada 29 Ogos 2002, dan Lee Kuan Yew : Singapore's paradox of freedom and order oleh David Ignatius dalam International Herald Tribune 28 September tahun yang sama. Kedua-dua artikel tersebut berkaitan.

Saya perturunkan kedua-dua artikel tersebut sepenuhnya - artikel pertama dalam catatan ini dan artikel kedua dalam catatan berikutnya - untuk berkongsi dengan pengunjung laman blog ini.

* * *
Bloomberg News Humbled

By WILLIAM SAFIRE
Published: August 29, 2002

Let me see if I can write today's column without getting sued. It has to do with my old pal Lee Kuan Yew, who prefers to be called ''senior minister'' rather than dictator of Singapore, and whose family members have been doing exceedingly well lately.

In kowtowing to the Lee family, the Bloomberg News Service -- the feisty, aggressive newcomer to coverage of global finance on cable and computers -- has just demeaned itself and undermined the cause of a free online press.

Early this month, Patrick Smith, a Bloomberg columnist, dared to take note of the elevation of Ho Ching, the senior minister's daughter-in-law, to head Temesek, the powerful state-owned investment company. Her husband, Lee's son, is already deputy prime minister and finance minister, on a fast track to the top; Lee's other son is C.E.O. of Singapore Telecom. Lee himself, at 78, is chairman of the Government Investment Corporation.

I have not read Smith's story because it has been expunged from the Bloomberg Web site, digitally erased from the mind of man. But evidently it annoyed some members of Lee's family, who are not known to lose huge libel suits that come before local judges.

This week Bloomberg issued a statement of abject apology. ''We recognize that this article was understood to mean'' that the appointment of Lee's daughter-in-law had been made ''not on merit, but in order to indulge the interests of the Lee family, or for some other corrupt motive relating to the promotion of the Lee family's interests. . . .''

Not only that, but ''Senior Minister Lee Kuan Yew and Deputy Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong [the latter is the appointee's husband, the senior minister's rising son] had procured the appointment of Mme. Ho Ching and were therefore guilty of nepotism.''

Bloomberg News, its corporate head cracking the floor in a classic kowtow, went on to ''admit and acknowledge that these allegations are false and completely without foundation. We unreservedly apologize . . . for the distress and embarrassment caused. . . .'' The media company offered to pay compensation for damages to avert a libel lawsuit.

A spokesman for the prime minister put in place to keep the seat warm for Lee's son (Wait. I take that back, unreservedly. Start again.) A spokesman for the aggrieved prime minister quoted lawyers saying ''that by publishing the article without exercising due care, Bloomberg and Patrick Smith had acted maliciously.''

In preparing today's profoundly respectful column, I acted with the due-est of care by calling the senior minister in Singapore, an island I cannot visit because I like to chew gum and don't want to risk a caning for it.

Lee sent back word through an ambassador that he saw ''no point'' in talking to me again (as he did a few years ago in Davos, reported in this space with exquisite fairness) because he had had ''nothing to do'' with the Ho appointment. (Besides, not long ago he sent me an autographed copy of his autobiography and I failed to plug it. His pique is understandable.)

Smith, the author of the never-to-be-accessed article, is said by a Bloomberg spokesman to be ''an outside columnist, not a staff member.'' (How's that for standing by your man?) He is a veteran Far Eastern correspondent with a fine reputation, having worked in Tokyo and Hong Kong for The International Herald Tribune.

Thereby hangs a tale. In 1994 The I.H.T. published an article about Lee's son that the old man thought imputed nepotism; when Lee sued, The Trib (owned by The New York Times and Washington Post) cravenly caved and settled for $400,000. Some of us took loud exception, and I doubt that such a sellout of principle will happen again. The New York Times, which willingly corrects itself when in error, does not settle libel charges for money. Never.

Autocratic regimes professing to be democracies have been known to use their judiciary systems to jail or bankrupt dissidents and intimidate resident reporters. Electronic media professing to practice journalism have been known to trade their integrity for global access. Where is the greater corruption?

I tried to reach the C.E.O. of Bloomberg, Lex Fenwick, but he dove under his desk. The founder, one Michael Bloomberg, is no longer with the firm and left no forwarding address.

[Sumber: http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9800E7DF173FF93AA1575BC0A9649C8B63 (17 Oktober 2008)]
* * *